<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>IPA on Gremlyn&#39;s Beer Blog</title>
		<link>https://beer.thegremlyn.com/tag/ipa/</link>
		<description>Recent content in IPA on Gremlyn&#39;s Beer Blog</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:12:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://beer.thegremlyn.com/tag/ipa/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>On Black IPA, and other IPA variants.</title>
				<link>https://beer.thegremlyn.com/2016/05/13/black-ipa-ipa-variants/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://beer.thegremlyn.com/2016/05/13/black-ipa-ipa-variants/</guid>
				<description>I&amp;rsquo;m getting on my soapbox again with this post, and it seems my opinion isn&amp;rsquo;t the most popular, but I really don&amp;rsquo;t understand how a Black IPA can be a thing. Not every hoppy beer has to be an IPA!</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Dank as an IPA Descriptor</title>
				<link>https://beer.thegremlyn.com/2015/08/06/dank-as-an-ipa-descriptor/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://beer.thegremlyn.com/2015/08/06/dank-as-an-ipa-descriptor/</guid>
				<description>Am I the only person that feels like ‘dank’ is not a valid term to describe an IPA? Unless I misunderstand the origin, it comes to us from pot culture, where I guess dank is a good thing. I’m not sure how it could ever be a good thing because all it does for me …</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
